Null coalescing operator c# empty string

I like the idea to use extension methods, but sometimes little details like this could cause some trouble. Have you consider using the extension proposed by Phil as a static method instead? IsNullOrEmpty items? ToNullIfEmpty argument?? Isn't it simpler to just have an extension do it all?

IsNullOrEmpty input? NotEmpty "defaultValue" ;. Colin: I used to feel the same way about var, but now I love it. And my attempt to participate, a reply to Colin: var is not necessarily associated with LINQ nor is it a sign of being lazy.

Trim ; if trim. As much as people like to say Extension methods can cause confusion, leads me to belive that some people's memory capacity is limited or non-existant. If you don't know if a method is an extension method, hover your mouse over the method and VS will show you. After that, next time you see that extension method, you'll remember!

Operator in C programming. Introduction The?? It returns the left side operand if the operand is not null else it returns the right side operand. Example int? The same is in the second example. We could check whether the message was null and return an alternate value and result in a message return "Operator test because the message variable has value. A nullable type can represent a value that can be undefined or from the type's domain.

We can use the?? The nullish coalescing operator?? This can be contrasted with the logical OR operator , which returns the right-hand side operand if the left operand is any falsy value, not only null or undefined.

In other words, if you use to provide some default value to another variable foo , you may encounter unexpected behaviors if you consider some falsy values as usable e.

See below for more examples. Cust to see if that was null and provide an alternative to that. However, one problem I had was with String. The problem is that myObject. GetImportantString returns string.

Not what I wanted at all! IsNullOrEmpty myObject.